Members have submitted strong objections to the plans. A decision on the plans is listed for October.

Fiona Shenton, Coordinator of County Durham Greens, says:

“The plans put forward by the two housing companies involved, Barratt and Miller, have blatantly ignored the worsening climate emergency and are even weaker on mitigating this impact than the original outline planning proposal.

“We are asking Durham County Council to stick to its own planning policies, including its Climate Emergency Response Plan (CERP2), when it decides whether or not to approve the plans.

“To propose building new houses with gas boilers in a climate emergency when fossil fuel prices are likely to continue rising into the future shows a complete disregard or understanding for the crisis we are facing.

“The developers are also vague about commitments to meet the latest Building Regs Part L (on conservation of fuel and power) which came into force this summer. The plans also make no provision for public transport. They are car-centric.

“Sustainable and affordable energy is essential for future residents, so substantial amendments are needed to this lacklustre application.”

The proposed development is next to Bent House Lane just west of the A1(M) adjacent to Sherburn Road into Durham City. Our objection can be viewed on the Council’s planning portal here:
DM/22/01981/RM | Reserved matters application for 470 dwellings (appearance, landscaping, layout and scale) pursuant to DM/20/03558/OUT. | Land To The East Of Regents Court Sherburn Road Durham

Related post:

Holding Durham County Council to green belt land rules

The post Housing plans inadequate, say Greens appeared first on County Durham.

County Durham Greens have expressed concern over the watering down of new proposals for the licensing hackney carriage and private hire licences.

In our response to the county council’s public consultation on the new proposals we ask why they have been weakened since the previous draft.

“Why, given Durham County Council’s commitment to reduce emissions and to lead the way on climate change, is County Durham destined to have one of the weakest emission standards for taxi licensing across all the North East local authorities?”

We are also concerned that the county council is not following Department for Transport guidelines to ensure consistency of standards across local authority borders.

“Given that there was originally an aim to standardise the taxi emissions licence standards across all 12 North East local authority areas (as taxis do not stay within council boundaries) we would question why the council was unable to achieve this.

“We also feel there should be more of a statement on how the county council will be encouraging licensees to switch to electric vehicles, for example via grants or low emissions zones in the towns/city.”

We also point out that there is little in the new proposals about encouraging environmental sustainability by better vehicle maintenance, eco-driving practices, and switching off engines while stationary or idling. Other local authorities have statements on this.

Cllr Jonathan Elmer of County Durham Green Party said,

“The proposals fall short of what other councils in the region are doing in reducing the environmental impact of the taxi industry.

“Taxis are a very important part of transport provision. There is a great opportunity here to reduce their environmental impact, but Durham County Council appears to have rowed back on earlier proposals that recommended tighter emission regulations.”

The post Greens concerned over watering down of taxi rules appeared first on County Durham.